22:16  |  2 September 11
Members Login:
Username:    Password:      

Welcome,

This website takes a different approach to democracy: instead of voting on parties and personalities, you can vote on specific policies. Called ‘direct’ or ‘pure’ democracy, it empowers the population to voice its opinion on specific policy issues, allowing "the greatest happiness of the greatest number" to be expressed.

Have a look at the polls and topics in the Chamber of Debate and feel free to join, vote and make comments. If there is a topic of national significance that in your opinion should be included and put to the vote, please do let us know.

Once you have joined, you will be able to vote on emerging issues of the day as new polls are uploaded, allowing you to be part of this innovative forward-thinking opinion-polling barometer. more

Chamber of Debate

Debatable Subjects

3 ALLITERATIVE ADJECTIVES OF BRITISHNESS
BNP - expulsion of prospective 2012 London mayoral candidate Claire Khaw
ABORTION
BNP - leadership
ADOPTION - an unnecessarily lengthy process?
BNP 2012 London Mayoral Candidate
ADOPTION - same-sex couples
BNP Constitution - amendment to political objectives
AFGHANISTAN - Anjem Choudary, Al Muhajiroun, Wootton Bassett
British forces in Afghanistan and Iraq
AFGHANISTAN - mutiny
BRITISH FOREIGN POLICY - Afghanistan
BNP - banning of
BRITISH FOREIGN POLICY - Iran
BNP - colour bar
BRITISH FOREIGN POLICY - Iraq invasion

:: See all Categories

Should Claire Khaw have been expelled from the BNP for what she said on the Victoria Derbyshire Show?

It is shameful that the BNP never comes to the defence of any of its members even when it should.

Many of the people did not hear what was actually said on the Victoria Derbyshire Show or read the transcript of what was said, though that does not stop them from opining in the way that people feel quite justified in opining about the Koran or Mein Kampf, without feeling the need to read it first.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2011/07/transcript-of-what-i-said-on-victoria.html

It is sufficient that if a statement has caused offence, that is in itself sufficient reason to discipline or expel a member, irrespective of the rights and wrongs of the matter, apparently.

Who does Nick Griffin think he is – David Cameron?

If that is the case, then he would presumably have defended Ted Heath in sacking Enoch Powell from the Cabinet for his rivers of blood speech. Perhaps someone should ask the Chairman if that was what he would have done in Heath’s position.

Typically, a member is hung out to dry when they make what is perceived to be a gaffe. Claire Khaw claims she knew what she was doing and was even then marking out the battle lines to be fought against the liberal media. The mistake she made was in expecting someone in the party to get in touch with her to demand an explanation of what she was doing (which she would have given) before taking disciplinary action, but, as most members and ex-members of the BNP will tell you, there is no tradition of fair hearings or of protecting the rights of members the most important of which is freedom of expression, whose concept is no longer familiar to the people of this benighted country.

The Chairman said on radio once that he was not prepared to defend Jeffrey Marshall, currently East London Organiser, who made similar comments.

He could have, with presence of mind, suggested that the media get in touch with Jeffrey Marshall and it would have been a test of Jeffrey Marshall's political competence, been quite interesting to witness, as well as have created more media interest for the party and tested the calibre of this particular member.

Or, he could have issued a press release defending members who made perfectly legitimate expressions of private opinion on a subject that everyone is too afraid to discuss. However, it did not occur to the Chairman to do anything like this.

There is no future for the white man or for any organisation representing white people if white people cannot even bring themselves to treat each other honorably. Join the Debate

Newest Members

 Location:  Joined:
 Turner58  England  20 Jul 11
 Shoegal  England  1 Jul 11
 Deekod  Scotland  5 May 11
 ThirdChamber  England  29 Apr 11
 TheVoiceofReason2  England  10 Apr 11
 PCPringle  England  22 Mar 11
 Imbwa  The British Islands  14 Mar 11
 Chumley  England  26 Feb 11
Topics
Members

Current Poll Results

Top 5 Subjects of Debate

Should the BNP be banned?
Yes - 4% No - 96%
Should the death penalty be re-introduced in some form, eg for the worst cases of murder?
Yes - 68% No - 32%
Should the UK leave the EU and thereby regain control over its immigration policy?
Yes - 85% No - 15%
Should our Constitutional Monarchy be replaced by a Republic?
Yes - 30% No - 70%
Should immigration be controlled through compulsory ID cards?
Yes - 22% No - 78%

Why Join?

Why Join? Join only if you:

care enough to have a view on the topics listed in the Chamber of Debate

relish debate in civilised terms with those who may disagree with you

want to meet like-minded people with whom to organise your opposition or support of a political cause

This is The Meeting Place for the Political Activist. May you change minds and in turn have yours changed. May we all be clearer about what it is that we want (and whether it is good for us!).
How it works
       
    Home